Chris Scali will be a featured presenter at this timely conference, discussing the development of recent major class actions cases and decisions, as well as a looking at upcoming cases and current practice.
Business is hailing the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in AMEX III as the panacea for the failure of state courts to enforce certain arbitration agreements on the ground that they are unconscionable, but what effect will this have on the California Supreme Court?
In the last six months, California courts have drastically limited an employer’s ability to utilize a piece-rate system to pay its employees. Important court rulings have made it clear that each “hour worked,” as defined by the Labor Code, must be compensated and itemized if employers intend to exert any type of control, issue any directive, or place any requirement on their employees during non-piece-rate times.
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013, Judge Jed Beebe in the Santa Barbara County Superior Court denied Arturo Martinez’s motion for class certification against Santa Maria Ford for alleged DMV fee lumping violations under the Automobile Sales Finance Act (ASFA) and the Unfair Competition Law (UCL).
Pitfalls and Real World Compliance Issues in Auto Dealership F&I Departments
Chris Scali will be appearing as a guest lecturer at Northwood University’s Automotive and Marketing Management Program’s Dealership Legal Issues/Finance and Insurance Class. He will be giving a talk on Pitfalls and Real World Compliance Issues in Auto Dealership F&I Departments.
Chris Scali will chair and moderate this primer on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret law. In a half-day presentation, four experts will introduce these two areas of law in an accessible manner and will present best practices for how to create, maintain, protect, and enforce patents and trade secrets.
Chris Scali will be moderating a panel on The Dynamics of a Trade Secret Case—The Joys, Burdens & Frictions of the In-House & Outside Counsel Relationship at this year's Trade Secret Law Summit for the American Intellectual Property Law Association.
The National Association of Dealer Councel (NADC) featured the article Enforcing arbitration agreements: Unconscionability is still the battleground, but for how long?, by Christian Scali, in their June 2013 issue of Defender. In it he reviews the current state of laws governing pre-dispute arbitration agreements in California.
In the September 2013 edition of News Trax—published by the Auto Dealers Office Management Association (ADOMA)—you will find Christian Scali's article, titled Is your Red Flags Program up to date? In it he discusses the FTC's revised business guide on the Red Flags Identity Theft Rule, issued on June 12, 2013.
As those who read this blog regularly already know, courts have divided into two camps over the enforceability of contractual arbitration agreements. Both camps claim to have the same starting point: the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) public policy favoring arbitration, under which parties who contractually agree to arbitrate a dispute are absolutely bound to do so unless the agreement is clearly “unconscionable;” i.e., so unreasonable that it shocks the conscience.